Notice which side of the car is closest to the retaining wall.
Also interesting, is that this cab was hit by a
45 ft. tall light pole which was uprooted by a 757 going 500 mph,
but only the windshield.
www.af.mil/photos/bombing15.html
Below, notice the highway divider "white line"
underneath the taxi.
Note that there is no line near the base of the
pole.

lesdossiers.ifrance.com/lesdossiers/Terrorisme/Effroyable_Verite/Impact.htm
Note that in the picture above, the right front
fender (passenger side) is the one closest to the highway
barrier wall, in the one below, it is the left front fender.
Another way to think of this is to look at the rear bumper. In the
above pic, the drivers side part of the rear bumber is closest to
the center concrete wall.
The pic below shows the passenger side closest to the center
wall.

www.af.mil/search/media_related.asp?mediaID=1103


A 45ft tall lamp pole got hit by a 757
going 500+ mph which uprooted this lamp pole from its base, the
pole FELL on the cab, which was also moving at the time, but hit
only the windshield ??????
How could this violent collision only hit the windshield and not
scratch the car (which was also moving at the time)???
I try to picture this scenario occurring, but cannot fathom this to
be the result.




Look at the base of the pole below, the left side of the base is
curved in one pic, but is not in the other.
In the pic to the left it seems as though it is broken all the way
to the top of the base.

Also shown is the overpass signs, this is probably where the stone
wall is also.
The taxi was moved here for a photo op?
But why?
The 2 pics below show a different deris feild of glass
breakage.
Look in the "crux" of the bend, in the first pic, there is no
glass, in the second, there are several pieces of glass in the bend
area of the pole. In these 2 photos it is the passenger side front
of the cab which is closest to the guard rail.
While the drivers side of the cabs rear bumper which is closest to
the middle concrete highway barrier.
www.richmond.infi.net/~kozelsm/Pentagon_Lamppost_L.jpg.

www.dragonslair.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/77/p/1_vid.jpg
What is this "T" shaped piece of debris
above? It looks like a part of a light pole that supports 2 lights.
It does not appear to be part of the construction of the type of
light poles that are used in this area.
If this cab was moved for the
photo-op, which seems apparent here, then the cab driver was in on
it.
This makes the story about the poles, and possibly witnesses
themselves in suspect.
9/11
pentagon wtc photo analysis (Homepage)
Pentagon
Position of the
Taxi
There has been
some discrepancy as to where the taxi cab was positioned.
Pictures tell the story well, if we look at them in
detail.
Note in this first photo the
cab is next to the overpass sign.
Also note that there is a direct line between the tree ( in the
middle of the picture) and the left part of the Pentagon collapsed
wall.
Again, note that the is a direct line between the camera, the cab,
and the right side of the collapsed wall.
1) 
In the photo below, using the
angle of the camera and the satalite photo,
with triangulation we can determine where the cab was (and
was not).
The Yellow
lines show the full view of the camera.
The white line, shows the rightmost edge of the tree on the
overpass.
This white line follows through to the left portion of the
collapsed part of the Pentagon wall.
The purple line shows the path drawing a straight line from the
camera, through the cab, to the right side of the collapsed wall of
the Pentagon.
The Orange arrow shows the
overpass tree.
The light blue arrow shows the radio tower
2) 
Below is shownin a green circle
the tree near the overpass.
the blue line marks the edge of the concrete wall. the white line
shows the direct view from the camera, to the left most part of the
collapsed wall.
The purple arrow shows a straight line from the camera to the right
side of the collapsed wall, this line goes straight through the
cab.
3)
Above...
The orange circle shows the radio tower, and orange line shows its
shadow.
Notice on the picture below, a rendition
by another site showing that the cab and pole are behind the
concrete barrier. Using the sat photo above, the line of sight of
the white line would go straight through the cab, and the cab would
be in the LEFT side of the top picture, behind the tree, and would
be barely visible, if at all being partially hidden by the
tree.
This area between the purple and white arrows indicate the viewing
area between the tree and the base of the overpass sign
For the other site to be correct, the cab would have to
be on the very left of this viewing area.
We know it is not here. It is to the right, through the purple
line. The cab is actual partially hidden by the overpass sign
base.
www.dragonslair.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/77/poles_x_1.htm#pic
Note on the pic above, there is
ONE white highway divider line between
the overpass sign and the car, with one more white line, partially
under the car.
The next white line (to the south, or bottom) is about 20 feet
BEHIND the overpass
sign.






The light poles supposedly downed during the
attack seemed to prove that a large object (757) hit the Pentagon.
Reportedly a cab driver, who, while driving, had one of these poles
fall on his cab, supposedly causing minor injuries.
Pictures of this cab were taken at several different angles.
In many of the photos, is a man with a white shirt and hat standing
next to the cab, This gives one the impression that it is the cab
driver, though I have no confirmation on this, it is what one would
assume looking at the pictures. I guess cab drivers near the
Pentagon normally wear a tie.
A few of these pictures are not consistent with the rest.
The pictures shows the cab at a different angles to the wall, and
that the pole, debris field, and background are totally
different.
In the image shown below, the right front fender of the cab is the
closest fender to the guard rail. Also note the standing pole in
the background; I will get to that later.

To the far right, you can see the cab driver with his hat and white
shirt. Take note that the white highway divider line is near the
base of the pole.
Notice the concrete barriers on the other side of the guardrail. In
the other pictures this concrete barrier is missing.
This image shows the angle at which the "white car" picture was
taken. The yellow dots indicate downed poles, and blue dots, show
poles which were not hit.


Hi-res photo ...
www.af.mil/photos/images/bombing15.jpg
The above pictures show no concrete barriers, and also show the
left front fender closest to the guardrail. You can also see the
downed lamp pole in front of the cab, through the guardrail. If the
cab was moved to a different location, then why re-enact the
scenario with the cab driver with the hat, and lay the pole across
the street as if the "crime scene" hadn�t been touched? This is
evidence right?
Now below, note that no white highway divider line is visible
underneath the car.

Look closely at the hood and roof of the cab, not a scratch!
A 45ft tall lamp pole got hit by a 757 going 500+ mph which
uprooted this lamp pole from its base, the pole FELL on the cab
which was also moving at the time, but hit only the windshield
?
How could this violent collision only hit the windshield and not
scratch the car (which was also moving at the time)?
I try to picture this scenario occurring, but cannot fathom this to
be the result.
Back to the image of the white car with the light pole standing. In
the reconstruction picture below, the pole to the left of the
overpass seems to be the one in the first picture of the white car.
This pole was supposedly hit by the aircraft.
Also below notice the distance of the car from the overpass
sign.
Image of overpass...
Below is An artistic reconstruction to demonstrate the original
pole positions. The tallest pole in the middle-right of the picture
would have been the culprit.



Notice the pole and broken glass? There is also a "T" shaped piece
of debris that doesn't not seem consistent with the normal pole
structures in the area.

Now we see a white line underneath the taxi, but none near the base
of the pole!
Also notice the differences in the 2 pitures above. There is glass
debris a foot or two away from the pole in the bent area in the
first piture, but none in the second. Also we see some debris
touching the pole in the second picture, but none in the first. The
whole debris field looks totally different. One more item is the
curvature of the pole, compare these pictures with the white car
pic, and you will see that the pole curvature is different.
The two pics above, are enhanced resolution images. If you look
closely, the left side of the base of the pole, is straight, or
flat.
It seems that it was broken off toward the top of the base.
This top pic also shows and "arm" attached to the light fixture
with wires hanging out. This arm and wiring is not visible in the
other photos.
In the second pic, you can see that the left side of the base has a
curved break (shown in yellow).
So the angle of the car has been changed from the left front fender
closer to the barrier wall, to the right front fender closer to the
barrier wall. The taxi was moved from where the first pole was hit,
to the right of the overpass, or the middle of the overpass. It
also appears as if the pole and debris field were re-created. Lets
not forget that the windshield was broken in the middle, but the
car suffered not a scratch
This Taxi, the pole, and whole debris field were moved!
My original page with more graphics and photos supporting this.
The Pentagon cab scandal
pentagon strike 9/11
Response to snopes pentagon "rumor" urban legend 9/11
Pentagon Crash - 9/11 Encyclopedia
9/11 Pentagon taxi cab position flight 77 trajectory light poles
Detailed Analysis whether a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon -EXPLOSION AT THE PENTAGON
Main 9/11 Pentagon
investigation page
9/11
theories news video and photo analysis
September 11 investigation video and
photo analysis Pentagon and WTC
reference pictures from
renovation.pentagon.mil/Phoenix/9-11-2001/Page.html
and
www.dragonslair.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/77/poles_.htm